The Maple Monarchists
  • Blog
  • The Monarchy In Canada
    • The Canadian Royal Family
    • Vice-Regal Representatives
    • Arguments For Monarchy
    • The Crown & You
  • Special Projects
    • Discussion Topics >
      • Pan-Monarchism
      • Terms of Support
      • A Canadian Knighthood
      • Anarcho-Monarchism
      • Natural Government
    • Leadership Surveys
    • Letters >
      • Regarding Context Article
      • 2024 CanTrust Index
      • Contest Entry
    • Armorial of Haiti
  • Useful Links
  • Contact & Questions
    • About the Authors

Full Transcript of the King's Speech to Congress

4/30/2026

 
"Mr. Vice President, Mr. Speaker, members of Congress,
representatives of the American people across all states,
territories, cities and communities.

I would like to take this opportunity to express my particular
gratitude to you all for the great honour of addressing this
joint meeting of Congress and, on behalf of the queen and
myself, to thank the American people for welcoming us to the
United States to mark this semi-quincentennial year of the
Declaration of Independence.

And for all of that time, our destinies as nations have been
interlinked. As Oscar Wilde said, ‘We have really everything in
common with America nowadays except, of course, language.’

​Ladies and gentlemen, we meet in times of great uncertainty;
in times of conflict from Europe to the Middle East which
pose immense challenges for the international community
and whose impact is felt in communities the length and
breadth of our own countries.

We meet, too, in the aftermath of the incident not far from
this great building that sought to harm the leadership of your
nation and to foment wider fear and discord.

Let me say with unshakeable resolve: such acts of violence
will never succeed. Whatever our differences, whatever
disagreements we may have, we stand united in our
commitment to uphold democracy, to protect all our people
from harm, and to salute the courage of those who daily risk
their lives in the service of our countries.

Standing here today, it is hard not to feel the weight of history
on my shoulder — because the modern relationship between
our two nations and our own peoples spans not merely 250
years, but over four centuries. It is extraordinary to think that
I am the 19th in our line of sovereigns to study, with daily
attention, the affairs of America.

So, I come here today with the highest respect for the United
States Congress, this citadel of democracy created to
represent the voice of all American people to advance sacred
rights and freedoms.

Speaking in this renowned chamber of debate and
deliberation, I cannot help but think of my late mother, Queen
Elizabeth, who, in 1991, was also afforded this signal honour
and similarly spoke under the watchful eye of the Statue of
Freedom above us. Today I am here on this great occasion in
the life of our nations to express the highest regard and
fr
iendship of the British people to the people of the United
States.

As you may know, when I address my own Parliament at
Westminster, we still follow an age-old tradition and take a
member of Parliament ‘hostage,’ holding him or her at
Buckingham Palace until I am safely returned. These days, we
look after our ‘guest’ rather well – to the point that they often
do not want to leave. I don’t know, Mr. Speaker, if there were
any volunteers for that role here today?


As I look back across the centuries, Mr. Speaker, there emerge
certain patterns, certain self-evident truths from which we
can learn and draw mutual strength.


With the spirit of 1776 in our minds, we can perhaps agree
that we do not always agree – at least in the first instance.
Indeed, the very principle on which your Congress was
founded – no taxation without representation – was at once a
fundamental disagreement between us, and at the same time
a shared democratic value which you inherited from us.


Ours is a partnership born out of dispute, but no less strong
for it, so perhaps, in this example, we can discern that our
nations are in fact instinctively like-minded – a product of the
common democratic, legal and social traditions in which our
governance is rooted to this day.


Drawing on these values and traditions, time and again, our
two countries have always found ways to come together. And
by Jove, Mr. Speaker, when we have found that way to agree,
what great change is brought about – not just for the benefit
of our peoples, but of all peoples.

This, I believe, is the special ingredient in our relationship. As
President Trump himself observed during his state visit to
Britain last autumn, ‘The bond of kinship and identity
between America and the United Kingdom is priceless and
eternal. It is irreplaceable and unbreakable.’


This is by no means my first visit to Washington DC – the
capital of this great republic. It is in fact my 20th visit to the
United States, and my first as King and head of the
Commonwealth.

This is a city which symbolizes a period in our shared history,
or what Charles Dickens might have called ‘A Tale of Two
Georges’: the first President, George Washington, and my
five-times Great Grandfather, King George III. King George
never set foot in America and, please rest assured, I am not
here as part of some cunning rearguard action.

The Founding Fathers were bold and imaginative rebels with
a cause. Two hundred and fifty years ago, or, as we say in the
United Kingdom ‘just the other day,’ they declared
Independence. By balancing contending forces and drawing
strength in diversity, they united 13 disparate colonies to
forge a nation on the revolutionary idea of ‘life, liberty and the
pursuit of happiness.’ They carried with them, and carried
forward, the great inheritance of the British Enlightenment –
as well as the ideals which had an even deeper history in
English common law and Magna Carta.


These roots run deep, and they are still vital. Our Declaration
of Rights of 1689 was not only the foundation of our
constitutional monarchy, but also provided the source of so
many of the principles reiterated, often verbatim, in the
American Bill of Rights of 1791.


And those roots go even further back in our history: the U.S.
Supreme Court Historical Society has calculated that Magna
Carta is cited in at least 160 Supreme Court cases since 1789,
not least as the foundation of the principle that executive
power is subject to checks and balances.


This is the reason why there stands a stone, by the River
Thames at Runnymede where Magna Carta was signed in the
year 1215. This stone records that an acre of that ancient and
historic site was given to the United States of America by the
people of the United Kingdom, to symbolize our shared
resolve in support of liberty, and in memory of President
John F. Kennedy.


Distinguished members of the 119th Congress, it is here in
these very halls that this spirit of liberty and the promise of
America’s founders is present in every session and every vote
cast.

Not by the will of one, but by the deliberation of many,
representing the living mosaic of the United States. In both of
our countries, it is the very fact of our vibrant, diverse and
free societies that gives us our collective strength, including to
support victims of some of the ills that, so tragically, exist in
both our societies today.


And, Mr. Speaker, for many here – and for myself – the
Christian faith is a firm anchor and daily inspiration that
guides us not only personally, but together as members of our
community. Having devoted a large part of my life to
interfaith relationships and greater understanding, it is that
faith in the triumph of light over darkness which I have found
confirmed countless times.


Through it I am inspired by the profound respect that
develops as people of different faiths grow in their
understanding of each other. It is why it is my hope – my
prayer – that, in these turbulent times, working together and
with our international partners, we can stem the beating of
plowshares into swords.


I am mindful that we are still in the season of Easter, the
season that most strengthens my hope. It is why I believe,
with all my heart, that the essence of our two nations is a
generosity of spirit and a duty to foster compassion, to
promote peace, to deepen mutual understanding and to value
all people, of all faiths, and of none.


The alliance that our two nations have built over the
centuries, and for which we are profoundly grateful to the
American people, is truly unique. And that alliance is part of
what Henry Kissinger described as Kennedy’s ‘soaring vision’
of an Atlantic partnership based on twin pillars: Europe and
America. That partnership, I believe Mr. Speaker, is more
important today than it has ever been.


The first reigning British sovereign to set foot in America was
my grandfather, King George VI. He visited in 1939 with my
beloved grandmother, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother.
The forces of fascism in Europe were on the march, and some
time before the United States had joined us in the defence of
freedom. Our shared values prevailed.


Today, we find ourselves in a new era, but those values
remain.


It is an era that is, in many ways, more volatile and more
dangerous than the world to which my late mother spoke, in
this chamber, in 1991.


The challenges we face are too great for any one nation to bear
alone. But in this unpredictable environment, our alliance
cannot rest on past achievements, or assume that
foundational principles simply endure. As my Prime Minister
said last month: ‘ours is an indispensable partnership. We
must not disregard everything that has sustained us for the
last eighty years. Instead, we must build on it.’


Renewal today starts with security. The United Kingdom
recognizes that the threats we face demand a transformation
in British defence.


That is why our country, in order to be fit for the future, has
committed to the biggest sustained increase in defence
spending since the Cold War – during part of which, over 50
years ago, I served with immense pride in the Royal Navy,
following in the naval footsteps of my father, Prince Philip,
Duke of Edinburgh; my grandfather, King George VI; my
great uncle, Lord Mountbatten; and my great grandfather,
King George V.


This year, of course, also marks the 25th anniversary of 9/11.
This atrocity was a defining moment for America and your
pain and shock were felt around the whole world. During my
visit to New York, my wife and I will again pay our respects to
the victims, the families, and the bravery shown in the face of
terrible loss. We stood with you then. And we stand with you
now in solemn remembrance of a day that shall never be
forgotten.


In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, when NATO invoked
Article Five for the first time, and the United Nations Security
Council was united in the face of terror, we answered the call
together – as our people have done so for more than a
century, shoulder to shoulder, through two World Wars, the
Cold War, Afghanistan and moments that have defined our
shared security.


Today, Mr. Speaker, that same, unyielding resolve is needed
for the defence of Ukraine and her most courageous people. It
is needed in order to secure a truly just and lasting peace.
From the depths of the Atlantic to the disastrously melting
icecaps of the Arctic, the commitment and expertise of the
United States Armed Forces and its allies lie at the heart of
NATO, pledged to each other’s defence, protecting our
citizens and interests, keeping North Americans and
Europeans safe from our common adversaries.


Our defence, intelligence and security ties are hard-wired
together through relationships measured not in years, but in
decades.


Today, thousands of U.S. service personnel, defence officials
and their families are stationed in the United Kingdom, as
British personnel serve with equal pride across 30 American
states. We are building F-35s together. And we have agreed
the most ambitious submarine program in history, AUKUS, in
partnership with Australia, a country of which I am also
immensely proud to serve as sovereign.

We do not embark on these remarkable endeavors together
out of sentiment. We do so because they build greater shared
resilience for the future, so making our citizens safer for

generations to come.

Our common ideals were not only crucial for liberty and
equality, they are also the foundation of our shared
prosperity. The rule of law: the certainty of stable and
accessible rules, an independent judiciary resolving disputes
and delivering impartial justice. These features created the
conditions for centuries of unmatched economic growth in
our two countries. This is why our governments are
concluding new economic and technology agreements – to
write the next chapter of our joint prosperity and ensure that
British and American ingenuity continues to lead the world.


Our nations are combining talent and resources in the
technologies of tomorrow: our new partnerships in nuclear
fusion and quantum computing, and in AI and drug
discovery, holding the promise of saving countless lives.


More broadly, we celebrate the 430 billion dollars in annual
trade that continues to grow, the 1.7 trillion dollars in mutual
investment that fuels that innovation, and the millions of jobs
on both sides of the Atlantic supported across both
economies. These are strong foundations on which to
continue to build, for generations yet unborn.


Our ties in education, research, and cultural exchange
empower citizens and future leaders of both countries.


The Marshall Scholarship, named after the great General
George Marshall, and the Association of which I am so proud
to be patron, are emblematic of the connection between our
two countries.


Since its founding, more than 2,300 scholarships have been
awarded, opening doors for Americans from all walks of life to
study at the United Kingdom’s leading universities.


So as we look toward the next 250 years, we must also reflect
on our shared responsibility to safeguard nature, our most
precious and irreplaceable asset.


Millennia before our nations existed, before any border
drawn, the mountains of Scotland and Appalachia were one, a
single, continuous range, forged in the ancient collision of
continents.


The natural wonders of the United States of America are
indeed a unique asset, and generations of Americans have
risen to this calling: indigenous, political and civic leaders,
people in rural communities and cities alike, have all helped
to protect and nurture what President Theodore Roosevelt
called ‘the glorious heritage’ of this land’s extraordinary
natural splendor, on which so much of its prosperity has
always depended.


Yet even as we celebrate the beauty that surrounds us, our
generation must decide how to address the collapse of critical
natural systems which threatens far more than the harmony
and essential diversity of nature. We ignore at our peril the
fact that these natural systems, in other words, nature’s own
economy, provide the foundation for our prosperity and our
national security.


The story of the United Kingdom and the United States is, at
its heart, a story of reconciliation, renewal and remarkable
partnership.


From the bitter divisions of 250 years ago, we forged a
friendship that has grown into one of the most consequential
alliances in human history.


I pray with all my heart that our alliance will continue to
defend our shared values, with our partners in Europe and the
Commonwealth, and across the world, and that we ignore the
clarion calls to become ever more inward-looking.


Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice-President, distinguished ladies and
gentlemen, America’s words carry weight and meaning, as
they have since Independence.


The actions of this great nation matter even more.

President Lincoln understood this so well, with his reflection
in the magisterial Gettysburg Address that the world may
little note what we say, but will never forget what we do.


And so, to the United States of America, on your 250th
birthday, let our two countries rededicate ourselves to each
other in the selfless service of our peoples and of all the
peoples of the world.


God bless the United States and God bless the United
Kingdom."

It has been interesting watching the response to the King's speech. My favourite is below as I think it sums things up nicely;
Picture
Loyally Yours,
A Kisaragi Colour

The King's Architectural Vision Wins Out

9/29/2025

 
Picture
A few days ago the BBC published an article on the British 
government's upcoming announcement of new towns to be 
built to alleviate Britain's housing crisis. A large proportion 
of the article goes into how the King's architectural vision has 
greatly influenced how these new towns will be designed. 
 
This is certainly a change from when the King was still just a 
prince. His famous comment describing a proposed addition 
to the National Gallery as a "monstrous carbuncle" was not 
well received by the architectural community. His initiative 
to build a town to showcase his ideas regarding community 
planning was derided as a 'toy town', 'doomed experiment', 
and a 'kitsch Disneyland'. However, Poundbury has been a
great success and this is largely due to the then-Prince
insisting on his vision despite opposition from within his own
team.

The civic planning of the 60s, 70s, and 80s was defined by car
centrism, brutalist architecture, a lack of community spaces,
and radical separation of how space was used. These ideas
destroyed many areas of Britain and other communities
around the world. One commenter recently quipped that
car infrastructure destroyed more of Halifax than the Halifax
Explosion ever did.

In taking on the thankless task of showing that communities
built to the human scale (walkable, mixed use, and nice to
look at) were not only possible but what people want, the
King has done a great service to the people of the UK.

Now, if only the planners in Canada's major cities could get a
similar wake-up call.

Loyally Yours,
A Kisaragi Colour

Prince William, Noblesse Oblige, and Ending Homelessness

6/30/2023

 
Picture
Earlier this week Prince William 
announced his plan to end 
homelessness in the United 
Kingdom. The initiative is called 
'Homewards' and takes inspiration 
from a similar program in 
Finland, which has nearly halved its
homeless numbers since 2010.
Under the Homewards program the homeless will be given a
place to stay before other issues such as drug use, joblessness,
or mental health issues are sorted out. Efforts will also be
made to identify those at risk before they become homeless in
order to offer assistance.

The project currently has 16 private sector partners across six
locations. Land from his private estate (Duchy of Cornwall)
will be used to build social housing. The job ahead is immense
with an estimated 300,000 people in the UK dealing with
homelessness. A number that is expected to rise with rising
inflation and energy costs.

Prince William credits the influence of his mother, Princess
Diana, for him taking on this cause. She felt the then 11-year
old Prince William should be exposed to how those of much
humbler means were forced to live and the experience seems
to have stuck with him. This is not Prince William's first
initiative to raise awareness of homelessness in the UK but
it is the first with the greatly expanded resources and soft
power that come with being the Prince of Wales at his
disposal.

As with any attempt at doing good these days there are
detractors. Most of this uninformed criticism focuses on
Prince William's relative wealth (much the same as people
who complained about His Majesty flying in private jets while
trying to negotiate carbon reduction). I think this misses the
point.

Once upon a time elites honoured the principle of noblesse
oblige
even if they did not always live up to it. And it is far
better for elites to view themselves as having an obligation to
help their fellow citizens than for elites to view their fellow
citizens has a hinderance to their interests. The latter view has
infected the elites in the USA for many years and has created an increasing number of monsterous examples who I will not
discuss here. A country's elite should look to better the lives of the less fortunate and in this regard Prince William is setting
a wonderful example. 

​Of course some also argue that reducing homelessness should
be a government responsibility and royal action in this area
limited what government can do. Bull crap. Again referring
back to Charles, when he was still the Prince of Wales; he got
the wheels rolling on climate action long before governments
were onboard with it. Rather than squeeze out the Members
of Parliament and governments of the day I think it provided
both inspiration and admonishment to the political elite who
are ever-eager not to get too far ahead of popular opinion. By
making ending homelessness a royal issue it implicitly raises
the question of what the government is planning to do to fight
it. Now this initiative could fail or it could take longer to
accomplish than people thought it would (which many
wrongly count as failure) but at the end of the day Prince
William is willing to do something about homelessness and
that is to be applauded.

Loyally Yours,
A Kisaragi Colour

Coronation Cost Too Much? Its A Steal At Double The Price.

5/7/2023

 
Picture
The King's coronation this past 
Saturday went off without a 
hitch and frankly was a beautiful
affair. It is hard to believe that 
the British were once held to be 
rather bad at pulling off such 
highly orchestrated events. And, 
as with all things these days it
seems, someone is worried that 
too much money is being spent.

The final cost won't be known for some time but unofficial 
estimates put it at $125 million on the high end. Now, it 
would be rather trite to call that a rounding error in a country 
with a yearly GDP of 3 trillion dollars, so I won't. Instead, I
want to do a small comparison with republics. Specifically, I
​want to take a look at inauguration costs (all sums given in
US Dollars).

United States of America

The USA is to republics what the UK is to monarchies; the
arch-typical example everyone seems to compare themselves to. In the US there is a presidential inauguration every four
years. The price varies (but rises with inflation) and private
donations cover some of the costs but taxpayers in the US are
​usually on the hook for about $100 million.    

France + Germany

The French in inauguration is a bit of an all day affair. There
is the constitutionally required parts followed by various
events around Paris. The Germans have much more low-key
inaugurations.

What both France and Germany have in common is the
difficulty in finding cost breakdowns. The French example
probably reaches the $100 million threshold while the
German example probably doesn't.

Ireland

Again, a full costing does not seem to be available but they did
spend $110,000 on catering for the 2018 inauguration. Its a
bit iffy if Ireland reaches the $100 million threshold. The
main determiner is staffing costs for security and clean-up
which might push it up a bit. An educated guess would be
$500,000 all told.

Time Between Events

Coronations don't happen at set intervals and can vary
between a few years and many decades. Usually a long reign
means a short interval will follow. If you averaged it out you'd probably come out with something close to one coronation
every 20 years. I'm going to say once every ten years for the
sake of the argument I'm making.

Presidential terms vary but for the examples I've used its; US
four years, France five years, Germany five years, and Ireland
seven years. The result being that the US and France spend
twice as much on inaugurations than the UK spends on
coronations. Ireland probably spends more if a 20 year
average interval is used and Germany might have spent more
on inaugurations during the Queen's reign.

More Bang Per Buck

All of which is to say that the King's coronation is not out of
line with what other countries spend on ceremonial transfers
of power and may be on the less expensive side due to longer
intervals on average compared to republics. There is also the
point to be made that since the coronation covers many
different realms its a bargain for all involved. I don't think a
Canadian republic would long avoid having its own, perhaps
modest, inauguration event. The result being the introduction
of a cost it doesn't currently have. Plus, the coronation was
a far more spectacular event than any inauguration. People
​need to learn to stop being penny wise, pound foolish.
Picture
Loyally Yours,
A Kisaragi Colour

How King Charles III Can Keep His Voice During His Reign

10/27/2022

 
Picture
Earlier this month former British 
Prime Minister Liz Truss managed, 
during her very short time in office, 
to advise His Majesty not to attend 
the environmental gathering known 
as COP27. By convention the king has
a duty to follow the advice of his
prime minister even if pretty much
everyone knows he doesn't want to.
Even now, with a brand new prime
minister in place, His Majesty is not
likely to attend. There is still a bit of debate over how much
this was a joint decision but for the sake of this article lets
assume King Charles III would want to attend COP27 to bring
further attention to increasingly worrisome environmental
issues. How could he do so?

The unimaginative might suggest he simply ignore his prime
minister's advice. He is not likely to do this. Not only would it
damage a working relationship that will (presumably) last
more than a couple months, it would feed into the perception
that he intends to 'meddle' in government affairs. Both factors
would reduce the monarch's considerable soft power which is
​worth avoiding.
As it happens there is a way for His Majesty to continue to
carry out most, if not all, of his previous work and it is by
learning from an incident that took place in Canada in 1973.
At the time Canada was hosting a meeting of Commonwealth
leaders. British prime minister Edward Heath, for whatever
reason, advised the Queen not to attend. The Commonwealth
was to the Queen what the environment is to the King. The
Queen was able to attend the meeting because she received an
invitation to attend as the Queen of Canada by Pierre Trudeau
(hey! History is starting to rhyme a little). This works as while
the monarch can be advised not to do something in their
capacity as monarch of that country, they can't be barred from
acting as monarch of another country. With this we have ​a
blue print for King Charles III regaining his voice.
Picture
First meeting between Prime Minister Trudeau and His Majesty
Now, I could suggest that Justin Trudeau invite the King and
this would make a certain amount of sense. Justin Trudeau
has come under criticism for making very little progress on
his climate plan. Having a champion of climate reform
present distracts from this narrative and is the type of
ceremonial action the prime minister is good at. That said,
Trudeau hasn't been overly kind to the monarchy during his
time in office. Are there any other candidates? Well, yes,
actually. Papua New Guinea recently stated they wished to
deepen ties with the Royal Family. And climate change will
hit Papua New Guinea, and other equatorial nations with
particular severity. The King and hi
s Papua New Guinean
realm could make common cause at COP27. And there is no
reason the King couldn't ask around the rest of the
Commonwealth for partners on other issues. King Charles III
is head of 15 countries. Perhaps he should make better use of
this fact.

Loyally Yours,
A Kisaragi Colour

Prince Charles, His Detractors, and the Future of the Monarchy

5/17/2022

 
PicturePrince Charles
Prince Charles has been sometimes 
criticised for the way he expresses his views 
on matters of personal interest to him such 
as environmental affairs. However, a 
monarch being involved in political affairs 
is hardly something that would doom a 
constitutional monarchy. Charles’s image is 
really bound-up with the drama of his two 
marriages rather than his personality. 

The politician from across the Commonwealth who has really
trash talked Charles the most, is perhaps Maxime Bernier, at
least in recent times. Bernier in his days as a cabinet minister
never revealed any republican sentiment but as the
momentum of his right-wing populist movement has grown,
he has become more vocal over the issue. At this point,
Maxime is unlikely to return to Ottawa anyway even if the
PPC vote does increase by a large margin, but, this still could
put pressure on the Tories.
Picture
The monarchy in Canada has actually proven to be a pretty
resilient thing however controversial it may be. This might be
attributed to the Monarchist League of Canada having been
able to stay focused on presenting the argument for monarchy
in a non-partisan way and working to maintain a degree of
influence, to the extent of perhaps having the chairman sit
next to the leader of the opposition at a state dinner, or having
the deputy prime minister attend one of their events.

But the biggest threat to the monarchy in Canada is the
perception of Prince Charles being political. However, the
monarchy’s European counterparts show that this does not
need to be so. The other monarchies in Europe appear to
generally be suffering less controversy than that of the House
of Windsor despite being perceived as being more political. It
is also important to remember that whilst the financing of the
monarchy in the UK is part of the debate, Canada does not
send a single penny to Buckingham Palace. It would be
difficult for any politician like Bernier to use “taxpayers
money” as ammunition against it.

It feels pretty unrealistic that there will be any real appetite to
skip Charles, even if we had the option. It is important to
remember that constitutional monarchy can be refereed by
the public fairly easily. The royal houses have proved to be
highly sensitive to public opinion. In the UK this was
famously the case with Edward VIII’s controversial choice of
wife but more recently in Spain when their king was
humiliated into abdication by his own scandals. Spain appears
to be the only other European monarchy to be suffering the
same level of crisis in public image as the UK has. Despite
what tabloids like to shake up in the English speaking world,
such a “royal crisis” appears to be bigger in Spain than it is in
the UK, to the extent that quite a few mainstream Spanish
politicians have actually advocated a republic in contrast to
the very small number of British republicans in Westminster
and even smaller number of them who actually have tried to
campaign for a republic. Charles doesn’t face the same
pressure as Juan Carlos did.

People have at times raised an eyebrow over Prince Charles
(and his sons) acting ‘woke’. But Dutch royalty has been able
to work pretty well with ‘wokeness’, advocating LGBT,
immigration, environmental affairs, and other such things
related to social justice.  This does frustrate some
conservatives but not to the extent of fanning republican
sentiment. The widespread support for the royalty continues
to be preserved.
Picture
Prince Charles speaking at COP21
With the more recent generation of royals, marrying
commoners has become increasingly natural. The Nordic
royals have been doing this for some time now but even in the
very conservative Japan it’s now been accepted. Charles’ wife
Camilla has not used the title “Princess of Wales” but this
reflects the sensitivity related to Diana. There shouldn’t be
any similar reason why Camila won’t be Queen consort.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s behaviour is hardly doing
the monarchy any favours but their antics do not appear to be
damaging Charles specifically.

Many heirs to the thrones have faced skepticism during their
early royal careers both before and after ascending to the
throne. But the best news for Prince Charles is that his public
image has improved no doubt as a result of his own efforts to
downplay his more controversial interests . People are already
forgetting about the bizarre portrayals of him of the past and
are starting to view him as a benign figurehead. A few in the
UK have proposed becoming a copycat Republic of Ireland
but Charles alone does more public engagements than the
Irish President despite Charles not being the Head of State.
He is just that committed.

With Prince Charles filling in for the Queen more than ever
due to concerns over her health, for example stepping in for
the Queen at the recent state opening of Parliament, some
people have felt the need to stir up debate over his position
but, it seems this has been received very favourably by the
British public. The British public likes what they are seeing
and respect for Charles is growing at the right time.

Loyally Yours,
Lord Ludichris

Meme Monday #9

3/22/2021

 
Picture
There are some poll results that get funnier the longer you 
look at them and consider the scenarios that could play out. A 
​recent YouGov poll carried out in the UK is one such example.
The idea of republicans actually getting rid of the monarchy 
only for the people to then elect Prince William is funny to 
me. And then there is the fourth place finish of 'Me' as the 
person those surveyed would like chosen. Finally, Nigel
Farage and Jeremy Corbyn make a match made in hell at 2%
of support each.

But seriously, there is some interesting information to be had.
For starters there is no unifying choice among respondents.
Even the Queen, who enjoys widespread support has uneven
support when voting is brought into the picture. There is also
an obvious disconnect between who people want and who
would actually get to vote for. David Attenborough has had 
plenty of opportunity to run for public office, takes public
positions on issues, and is obviously popular but has never
stood for election. Which leaves Boris Johnson as the most
credible candidate on this list to be president of a British
republic.

Loyally Yours,
A Kisaragi Colour

Brexit: A Case Study on why Messing with the Royal Prerogative is a Bad Idea

5/1/2019

 
Royal Prerogative refers to the powers Her Majesty wields,
either of her own accord or under advice from her ministers.
They are vast and somewhat poorly understood. They are also
rarely used unilaterally. Even so, their mere existence has at
times led to calls for them to be taken away or modified in
some way.

In Canada the most obvious examples of powers that some
want limits placed on would be the power to prorogue
parliament, dissolve parliament, and call by-elections. As it
happens Britain has modified some of these powers so it
might be instructive to look at what results it has produced.

Britain: Prolonging Brexit Agony

Picture
Westminster is known as the Mother of all
Parliaments
. It is what our parliament and
many others base their structure on. This
can sometimes obscure the fact that the
British Parliament didn't stop evolving in the meantime. The
Westminster Parliament our own sought to emulate is very
different these days. One of the ways it has become different
only ​went into effect in 2011. The Canadian Crown may
dissolve Parliament (usually on the advice of the prime
minister). The British Crown has lost this ability. In technical
terms those powers were put into abeyance. James Bowden
over at the Parliamentum blog has an in-depth look at the
Fixed-term Parliament Act (the legislation that now governs
when parliament is dissolved in Britain).

The act was passed so that prime ministers could no longer
time elections in their favour. Now, this strikes me as a bit of
a solution in search of a problem. After all, their is good
evidence
that voters punish politicians who blatantly try to
​game the system in this way. Which is something the British
Prime Minister ought to have kept in mind back in 2017 when
she used the act (and a willing opposition) to get an early
election called and returned to parliament politically
weakened.

You might expect this to mean the government would have a
short life. Normally, you would be right but the most
immediate effect of the Fixed-term Parliament Act has been
to make it harder for governments to be defeated. It is no
longer the case that merely losing a vote is seen as a matter of
confidence, it has to be explicitly stated in a separate motion.
Which means MPs can vote against a bill while later voting to
keep the government alive. And even if a confidence motion
does succeed parliament still has 14 days to find a new prime
minister and avoid an early election.   

This has had some pretty nasty effects on good governance.
The British Conservatives have been able to remain in
government while engaged in a civil war within their own
party. With both the Conservative and Labour Parties
statistically tied since the end of 2017 the Conservatives
want to avoid an election if possible. It has gotten so bad the
Queen has started to have to gently 
remind MPs to do
their job
.

This means that MPs never face a reckoning for how they
vote in Parliament. Had the previous method still been in
effect Britain would likely by now have gone through an
election ​and a new parliament would have been sworn in. This
would have had two positive effects;
1. It would calm demands for a second referendum since
there is little chance the election campaign wouldn't become
an unofficial referendum on Brexit. 
2. Having just fought an election the various factions in
Parliament would be in no condition to fight another one.
This is part of the reason why new governments are given a
bit of leeway in setting the agenda.

Would this have prevented the Brexit votes from reaching the
heights of absurdity that they have now? It is a definite
maybe. At the very least it would avoid the deadlock I often
​decry in the American system. An important safety valve has
been removed from the British state and one would hope it is
restored promptly.

Loyally Yours,
A Kisaragi Colour

That Time Economists Apologized to the Queen for the 2008 Financial Crisis

3/1/2019

 
Picture
In November of 2008 Her Majesty was
visiting the London School of Economics.
The financial crisis was well underway and
the Queen took the opportunity to pose
a question about the scale of the disaster
that everyone had been thinking; "If these
things were so large, how come everyone
missed them?
" It was a fair question that
​deserved a proper response.

And on July 22, 2009, the Queen received one. A group of
experts had gathered on the 17th to hammer out an answer to
​the Queen's question. The list of participants was actually very
impressive:
Professor Tim Besley, FBA, London School of Economics
Professor Christopher Bliss, FBA, University of Oxford
Professor Vernon Bogdanor, FBA, University of Oxford
Sir Samuel Brittan, Financial Times
Sir Alan Budd
Dr. Jenny Corbett, University of Oxford
Professor Andrew Gamble, FBA, University of Cambridge
Sir John Gieve, Harvard Kennedy School
Professor C. Goodhart, FBA, London School of Economics
Dr David Halpern, Institute for Government
Professor José Harris, FBA, University of Oxford
Mr. R. Harrison, Economic Adviser to the Shadow Chancellor
Professor Peter Hennessy, FBA, University of London
Professor Geoffrey Hosking, FBA, University College London
Dr. Thomas Huertas, Financial Services Authority
Mr. William Keegan, The Observer
Mr. Stephen King, HSBC
Professor Michael Lipton, FBA, University of Sussex
Rt. Hon. John McFall, MP, Commons Treasury Committee
Sir Nicholas Macpherson, HM Treasury
Mr. Bill Martin, University of Cambridge
Mr. David Miles, Bank of England
Sir Gus O’Donnell, Secretary of the Cabinet
Mr. Jim O’Neill, Goldman Sachs
Sir James Sassoon
Rt. Hon. Clare Short, MP
Mr. Paul Tucker, Bank of England
Dr. Sushil Wadhwani, Wadhwani Asset Management LLP
Professor Ken Wallis, FBA, University of Warwick
Sir Douglas Wass
Mr. James Watson, Dept. for Business, Innovation & Skills
Mr. M. Weale, Nat. Institute of Economic & Social Research
Professor Shujie Yao, University of Nottingham 

Having gathered and had a wide-ranging discussion Professor
Tim Besley and Professor Peter Hennessy summarized the
discussion into a three page letter and submitted it to the
​Queen. The letter is quite interesting. Or at least as interesting
as economics can be. The letter is part explanation, par
t Mea
culpa 
for their part in being unable to see the economic
disaster unfolding.

The letter promised that a future meeting would look at what
could be done to prevent Her Majesty from ever having to ask
her question again. And in December the promised meeting
took place and a second letter was delivered to the Queen.
In summarizing the discussion the group proposed a course of action which I have quoted below:
"So, we end with a modest proposal. If you, Your Majesty, were to ask for a
monthly economic and financial horizon-scanning summary from, say, the Cabinet
Office, it could hardly be refused. It might take a form comparable to the Joint
Intelligence Committee’s ‘Red Book’, which you received each week from 1952 until
2008 when it was abandoned. And, if this were to happen, the spirit of your LSE
question would suffuse still more those of your Crown servants tasked to defend,
preserve and enhance the economic well-being of your country."
​I'm actually curious if the Queen has opted to do this. It is
possible as the financial crisis did lead the Queen to start
becoming more involved. For instance it led to Mervyn King
being the first 
Bank of England governor being invited to
the palace
 for a chat with the Queen.

In the end a simple question from the Queen led a group of
people to thoroughly examine the causes of the greatest
economic disaster of our time and perhaps taught some
economists the value of seeing the big picture.

Loyally Yours,
A Kisaragi Colour

Threatening Tweet sent by Turgid Twits

2/1/2018

 
A student organization at the University of Liverpool is in a
bit of hot water over a tweet it made on January 29th (since
deleted). The University of Liverpool Labour Students
seemed to advocate in the tweet that Queen Elizabeth II be
beheaded:
Picture
They have since apologized and stated the tweet was 'tongue-
in-cheek'. Now, this is not the first time in recent memory that
an organization/person connected to the Labour Party has
said some stupid thing and then justified it by claiming it was
all a joke.

But let us take them at their word that this was a joke rather
than a serious proposal. What kind of people joke about the
execution of another person, let alone their head of state?
Especially, when actual beheadings are becoming much more
common with the rise of ISIS. But civility is declining
everywheres it seems. The president of the Philippines has
joked about rape multiple times and in one notable
instance about eating someone. 

It is concerning when these 'jokes' are made because it shines
a light on what the person thinks are acceptable norms in
society. On the flip side it makes light of a terrible period in
English history. Had there been no outcry that tweet would
still be up ​and they would be fine with it.

To the credit of many Labour Party members on campus they
quickly distanced themselves from the comments made by
their student leadership. For my part I sent a quick email to
the Vice-Chancellor expressing my concerns about this
incident. This is important as the actions of a few students
reflects poorly on the University of Liverpool as a whole.

UPDATE: The Vice-Chancellor has replied to my email. The
full text of this reply is at the bottom of this post. 

Loyally Yours,
A Kisaragi Colour
Dear [Name Redacted]

The Vice-Chancellor thanks you for your email. 

Colleagues from the Liverpool Guild of Students have spoken to the society about
this inappropriate post and, as you will have seen, this was taken down and an
apology posted. We are now working with the Guild of Students to speak to student
societies about their use of social media.


Regards
Lindsey
Executive PA to the Vice-Chancellor
<<Previous

    About

    This website is intended to be a resource for those arguing in favour of Canada's monarchy, researching Canada's royal past, or wondering what the various vice-regal representatives of the Canadian Crown are up to currently. As well, articles about other monarchies may appear from time to time. 

    Archives

    May 2026
    April 2026
    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014

    Categories

    All
    Afghanistan
    Aga Khan I
    Aga Khan II
    Aga Khan III
    Aga Khan IV
    Alberta
    Albert County
    Alexandra Mendès
    Alistair MacGregor
    Allison Lawlor
    Alt History
    Amita Kuttner
    Andrew Saxton
    Andrew Scheer
    Annamie Paul
    Archduke Franz Ferdinand
    Aria David
    Aron Seal
    Artwork
    Australian Monarchy
    Austria
    Barbados
    Barry MacKenzie
    Bloc Quebecois
    Blog Update
    Books
    Brad Trost
    Brazil
    Brian Graff
    British Columbia
    British Monarchy
    Canada Day
    Canada Post
    Canadian Monarchist News
    Canadian Monarchy
    CANZUK International
    Caribbean Monarchist League
    Carolingian Empire
    Carolyn Harris
    Cathy Bursey-Sabourin
    CFP
    Chandra Arya
    Charity
    Charlie Angus
    Charter Of Rights And Freedoms
    Chief Edward Machimity
    Chief John Thunder
    Chief Robert Joseph
    Chris Alexander
    Christian Bjørnskov
    Christmas
    Christ The King
    Citizenship Oath
    Clamavi De Profundis
    Commonwealth
    Communists
    Confederation
    Conservative Party
    Coronation
    Coronation Oath
    Costs Of The Crown
    Cricket
    Crown Jewels (of Canada)
    Crown Society Of Canada
    Dalton Camp
    David Johnson
    David Merner
    Deepak Obhrai
    Democracy
    Democracy Watch
    Denmark
    Derek Sloan
    Dominic Cardy
    Donald Booth
    Donald Trump
    Doug Ford
    Dr. Leslyn Lewis
    Duchess Of Cambridge
    Duchess Of Hohenberg
    Duke Of Cambridge
    Dylan Mainprize
    Dylan Perceval Maxwell
    Education
    Elizabeth May
    Elsie Wayne
    Emma Dent Coad
    Emperor Charles V
    Emperor Francis II
    Emperor Kangxi
    Emperor Nero
    Emperor Pedro II
    Emperor Qianlong
    English Monarchy
    Erin O'Toole
    FCP
    Fiji
    Frank Baylis
    French Monarchy
    Gaming
    George Stanley
    Glorious Revolution
    Government House
    Governor General
    Gov Gen. Adrienne Clarkson
    Gov Gen. David Johnston
    Gov Gen. Julie Payette
    Gov Gen. Mary Simon
    Grand Chief Henri Membertou
    Green Party
    Grenadian Monarchy
    GTA Branch
    Hawaii
    Heraldry
    Hitler
    Hockey
    Holy Roman Empire
    Homewards
    Hudson's Bay Company
    Ibrahim Bruno El-Khoury
    Interview
    Invictus Games
    Iran
    ISCC
    Jack Layton
    Jacques Monet
    Jagmeet Singh
    Jamaica
    James Hawkes
    Jean Charest
    Jody Wilson-Raybould
    John A. Macdonald
    John Boyko
    Jordan
    J.R.R. Tolkien
    Judy Green
    Julienne Bay
    Justin Trudeau
    Kathleen Wayne
    Kellie Leitch
    Kevin Gillespie
    King Alfonso XI
    King Carl XVI
    King Charles I
    King Charles II
    King Charles III
    King Charles XI
    King Christian IV
    King Edward I
    King Edward VII
    King Edward VIII
    King George I
    King George V
    King George VI
    King Henry VIII
    King James VI & I
    King Juan Carlos I
    King Louis XIV
    King Louis XVI
    King Matthias Corvinus
    King's Counsel
    King William IV
    King Zahir Shah
    Kisaragi
    Labour Party
    Leona Alleslev
    Letters Patent
    Liberal Party
    Lisa LaFlamme
    Lisa Raitt
    Lord Ludichris
    Loyalists
    Lt. Gov. Brenda Murphy
    Lt. Gov. Elizabeth Dowdeswell
    Lt. Gov. Graydon Nicholas
    Lt. Gov. Jocelyne Roy Vienneau
    Lt. Gov. John Graves Simcoe
    Lt. Richard Wilson
    Mackenzie King
    Magnum Concilium
    Marilyn Gladu
    Mark Steyn
    Mary Lincoln
    Maxime Bernier
    Meme
    Meryam Haddad
    Michael Chong
    Michael Valpy
    Mike Holland
    Mi'kmaw
    Mirrors For Princes
    Mohawks
    Monarchist League Of Canada
    Monarchist League Of Grenada
    Morocco
    Mr. Windsor
    Native Kingship
    Nawanagar
    NDP
    Neil MacAlasdair
    Netherlands
    New Brunswick
    Newfoundland
    News
    New Year's Levee
    New York
    New Zealand
    Normandy
    Nova Scotia
    Oath Of Allegiance
    Olympics
    Omoba Aina
    Ontario
    PACT
    Papua New Guinean Monarchy
    Parliament
    Pat Stogran
    PEI
    People's Alliance
    People's Party
    Peter Julian
    Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard
    Peter MacKay
    Peter Russell
    Peter Stoffer
    Philippe Lagasse
    Pierre Elliott Trudeau
    Pierre Lemieux
    Playlist
    Pope Boniface VIII
    Prime Minister
    Prince Albert
    Prince Andrew
    Prince Arthur
    Prince Charles
    Prince Edward
    Prince Ermias Sahle Selassie
    Prince Felipe
    Prince George
    Prince Harry
    Prince Philip
    Prince Reza Pahlavi
    Prince Rupert
    Princess Anne
    Princess Louise
    Prince Victor
    Prince William
    Profiles
    Progressive Bloggers
    Progressivism
    Quebec
    Queen Anne
    Queen Elizabeth I
    Queen Elizabeth II
    Queen's Counsel
    Queen Victoria
    Quotes
    Randall Garrison
    R.B. Bennett
    Referendum
    Religion
    Remembrance Day
    Republicans
    Restoration
    Richard Bassett
    Rick Peterson
    Right To Be Consulted
    Right To Encourage
    Right To Warn
    Rob Ashton
    Robert Finch
    Robert Pichette
    Robertson Davies
    Rob Moore
    Romana Didulo
    Rome
    Royal 22nd Regiment
    Royal Anthems
    Royal Christmas Message
    Royal Jubilee
    Royal St. John's Regatta
    Royal Tour
    Royal Warrant
    Saskatchewan
    Saudi Arabia
    Science
    Scott Aitchison
    Scott Morrison
    Sir David Kirke
    Sir Samuel Leonard Tilley
    Six Nations
    Social Media
    Stephen Harper
    St. John's
    Succession
    Sultan Alauddin Riayat Shah
    Supreme Court Of Canada
    The Ceremonial Guard
    The Constitution
    The Enlightenment
    The Mad Monarchist
    The Phoenix Project
    Tim Besley
    Timeline
    Tim Thompson
    Tom Freda
    Tom Mulcair
    Tony Abbott
    Tony Clement
    Tony McQuail
    Top 10 List
    United States
    Victoria Day
    Viscount Monck
    Wallis Simpson
    Walter Bagehot
    Wet'suwet'en
    Winston Churchill
    W. L. Morton
    Young Monarchists
    Yukon
    Yves Engler
    Yves-François Blanchet
    Zahedi Center

    RSS Feed

    Picture
    Proud Supporter of the Monarchist League of Canada
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Proud Supporter of Connecting Albert County
    Picture
    Elsie Wayne 1932-2016
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.