The Maple Monarchists
  • Blog
  • The Monarchy In Canada
    • The Canadian Royal Family
    • Vice-Regal Representatives
    • Arguments For Monarchy
    • The Crown & You
  • Special Projects
    • Discussion Topics >
      • Pan-Monarchism
      • Terms of Support
      • A Canadian Knighthood
      • Anarcho-Monarchism
      • Natural Government
    • Leadership Surveys
    • Letters >
      • Regarding Context Article
      • 2024 CanTrust Index
    • Armorial of Haiti
  • Useful Links
  • Contact & Questions
    • About the Authors

Prince Charles Addresses COP21 Conference in Paris

11/30/2015

 
PicturePhoto Credit: The BBC
Prince Charles addressed the
COP21 Conference on climate
change today. In his speech His
Royal Highness urged the
gathered national leaders to
commit to fighting climate
change.

This is an issue with which the
Prince has a lot of experience.
The Prince has been sounding
alarm bells long before it was
​fashionable to do so. 

The Prince's Speech

Below is a partial transcript of the remarks made by the
Prince of Wales. A video of the opening minute of his speech
can be found here. Link
Your deliberations over the next two weeks will decide the fate,
not only of those alive today, but also of generations yet unborn.
So I can only urge you to think of your grandchildren, as I think
of mine, and those billions of people without a voice. Those for
whom hope is the rarest of sensations. Those for whom a secure
life is a distant prospect. Most of all, I urge you to consider the
needs of the youngest generation. Because none of us has the
right to assume that for our today they should give up their
​tomorrow.
The Prince went on to say that "On an increasingly crowded
planet, humanity faces many threats - but none is greater
than climate change, i
t magnifies every hazard and tension
of our existence.
" Further, the Prince pointed out that climate
change will stress civil society to the breaking point:
"It threatens our ability to feed ourselves; to remain healthy and safe from extreme weather; to manage the natural resources that support our economies, and to avert the humanitarian disaster of mass migration and increasing conflict."

​All of which is consistent with what the Prince has been saying for years. But sadly Prince Charles has had to play the
part of a political Cassandra, more often mocked for his
views than respected.

Shortly after the address 
Philippe Joubert, Chair of The
Prince of Wales’s Corporate Leaders Group, remarked that
while success in putting a price on carbon would be good,
doing so while also continuing to subsidize carbon sources
makes no sense.

Loyally Yours,
A Kisaragi Colour 

Progressivism & Monarchy

11/28/2015

 
It is not a secret that, as a general rule, conservatives seem to
support monarchy more than progressives. While it is true
that conservative support for tradition and established
authority make support for monarchy quite natural what
aspect of monarchy makes it such an incomparable ideal for
progressives?

This question has played in the back of my mind for a while
now. I ponder it as my own examination of monarchy reveals
not two incompatible ideals as is commonly assumed but
ones that often gain a great deal from each other.

Before I continue with my main argument that monarchy
should be considered a progressive ideal it might be helpful to
define what I mean by both monarchy and progressivism. 

'Monarchy' literally means 'rule by one'. It is the world's most
successful system of government having been adapted for use
from China to Peru and from the dawn of human history up to
present day. A system that has been so widely used has to be
flexible. And, indeed, monarchy has many variations. While I
could get into the myriad differences between Canada's
hereditary chiefs and imperial Russia's tsars I'd like to
move ahead somewhat quickly. Sufficed to say that while
many of the points I will make apply to other forms of
monarchy I will be focusing strictly on constitutional
monarchy
where the monarch reigns but does not rule.
Constitutional monarchy is a system where the monarch lets
elected officials handle the day-to-day governance. The
monarch may have real reserve powers (as in Canada,
Denmark, Britain) or they my be limited to a strictly
ceremonial role (Sweden, Japan). Special mention should be
made of Monaco and Liechtenstein who have elected
assemblies but whose monarchs do participate in the
governing of the country. And while the Parliament need not
be democratic in a constitutional monarchy, remaining
constitutional monarchies are also mostly democratic states.  
'Progressivism' is an interesting belief system due in no small
part to the contested definition of it. I cast a wide net in my
search for an adequate definition consulting in their turn
Wikipedia, The Progressive Bloggers, a couple friends
of mine that I would consider progressive, and others. From
these sources I was able to come up with two definitions of
progressivism; one formal and one informal. The formal
definition is that progressivism is: 
The idea that advances in technology, science, and social
organization can produce improvements to the human
condition. Additionally, the belief that the above advances
have worth. A supporting belief is that history is linear, not
cyclical (ie. human progress never reaches a plateau or perfect
state but always seeks to move towards it).
My friends contributed much of what I call the informal
​definition of progressivism:
The idea that society must continue to change, that the status 
quo cannot be considered progressive. History itself has a
'story arc' leading to the further advancement of humanity.
Much of this article is meant to show that monarchy is a
system that uniquely supports human progress as defined by
the formal definition. Because the informal definition
explicitly excludes the status quo I will show that no other
system of government falls within it. ie that the definition
itself adds little value to our understanding of ​human
progress. But even then I will argue that monarchy can be
considered a progressive ideal. 

Ok, with a workable definition of what monarchy and
Progressivism is we can continue. I'm going to make a couple
assertions that I hope will be uncontroversial: 
1. An ideal is progressive when the basic ideas of
progressivism support its existence.
2. An individual is a progressive if they support progressive
ideals and undertake to advance progressive causes.
3. An institution is progressive when its existence supports
progressive ​results and is supported by progressive
individuals.

It is my argument that monarchy should be considered a
progressive institution/ideal. The primary purpose of making
this argument is to counter the assertion that republicanism is
somehow the more progressive option in all cases.  
As I have written about a number of times before there is
some interesting academic research that has been done on
monarchy as a government system. You can go through the
links above to find the relevant studies but to summarize: 
Picture
Monarchies handle large institutional reforms better
​than republics.

Picture
Monarchies may liberalize quicker than republics.

Picture
Directly electing heads of state contribute to a 5-7% drop
​in votes for legislative elections.

Picture
Electing heads of state does not appear to have any
effect on voter alienation or apathy.

Picture
Constitutional monarchies have a marked preference for
consulting the public in times of political dispute. 

Picture
Monarchies seem to generate, or at least do not harm,
generalized trust between citizens.

Picture
There is no correlation between monarchy and income
inequality.

Picture
Indirectly-elected presidents are no less likely to be
partisan if their position possesses actual power.

Picture
  Monarchies seem to better protect property rights.

The first point is especially important for progressives. The
ability to undertake institutional changes without negative
effects makes progress easier to achieve. If every change to
society results in noticeable difficulties there is a resulting
tendency towards the status quo. But overall, I bring these
studies up because progressives believe that scientific
knowledge should be taken into consideration when making
policy decisions. If improvements to social organization is a
value of progress it is equally true that those improvements
should have a basis in evidence.  

Further, since the above studies show that monarchy has
specific advantages when it comes to promoting economic,
democratic, and social progress it can in fact be argued that
​monarchy is a progressive ideal
.
But what of the monarchs themselves and their families?
Well, the Queen's address to the UN from 2010 sheds some
light on what Her Majesty values. Specifically the part that
says "I have also witnessed great change, much of it for the better, particularly in science and technology, and in social attitudes. Remarkably, many of these sweeping advances have come about not because of governments, committee resolutions, or central directives - although all these have played a part - but instead because millions of people around the world have wanted them." The Queen has also shown a keen interest in using new technologies to better carry out her roles as monarch. Prince Charles likewise has used
his position as the Prince of Wales to actively promote
progressive causes. His advice to government ministers
has likewise been of a progressive nature. The Duchess of
Cornwall has taken up the cause of rape victims. Prince
William recently spoke out against bullying and
homophobia in schools. Collectively the Royal Family
supports about 3000 charities. All of which is only to point
out that our Royal Family is a rather progressive bunch.
Much of this can be traced back to Prince Albert who was
​a major patron of science. "But", I hear you say, "what about
all those other monarchs?
"

Well, in Morocco the king has agreed to subsidize the
kingdom's solar power generation in order to keep prices low.
This step potentially sets the kingdom up to be a green
energy superpower.

And who can forget King Juan Carlos I's restoration of
Spanish democracy? He isn't even the only monarch in the
modern times to move from absolute rule to democracy. The
monarchs of Bhutan have encouraged democracy in the
country since the 1950s which culminated in a full transition
to constitutional monarchy in 2008.
 
Indeed, monarchy seems to have a tendency to produce
leaders who are more progressive than their subjects. This
makes sense when you consider that a low levels of education
is connected to greater political conservatism. Monarchs are
trained from birth to rule and also tend to have a long
apprenticeship. The odds are stacked against them becoming
conservatives. You could argue the reason that you see fewer
progressive monarchs in the House of Saud is their habit of
avoiding hereditary succession. A couple of years ago VICE
ran an article where they interviewed 
Baptiste Roger-Lacan
who noted that "It's important to notice that nowadays
republican France is more conservative compared with some European monarchies, like the Netherlands, Sweden, and Denmark.
" You could say much the same about Germany.


​But returning to the Canadian Royal Family we can see there
is a large number of progressives. This leads to my third point
that an institution made up of progressives can be considered
progressive itself. Nor are the progressives of the Royal
​Family the only progressives to support the monarchy.
With members promoting progressive causes and the
institution itself seeming to encourage progressive results I
argue the monarchy is a progressive institution. 

This concludes my look at monarchy from the perspective of
the formal definition of progressivism. Next up, the informal
definition.

My first thoughts on the informal definition is just how
common it is among republicans. The number of times I've
heard monarchy referred to as an archaic system is
unbelievable. That it seems to excludes any form of
government makes me question its usefulness. Consider that
the oldest currently existing republic was established in 301
AD. If progressivism entails a constant forward advance this
republic would be excluded. Could we say that any aspect of
government is progressive? Human rights? Nope. The
concept is quite old. Democracy? Ditto.

Ultimately, tying progress to movement from the status quo
always becomes problematic. There is a way around this.
Consider human rights as an example. While the concept of
human rights continues as a solid ideal how we interpret
them change over time. By the same token while the basic
premise of monarchy has remained the same it has gone
through major changes. Whether we look at the monarchy's
movement from executive to moral leadership, legitimacy via
divine right to legitimacy via parliamentary support, rule by
custom to rule by statute, or a single imperial crown to a
multitude of national crowns it is hard to argue that the
monarchy has not changed (and continues to change). But in
doing so it has kept fundamental aspects of itself consistent
because they work. So in a sense you could argue that
monarchy meets the informal ​definition of progress. Going
from a monarchy to a republic isn't so much progress as it is
jumping from one path to another.

Now, while I think I have made a good effort at explaining
why I see monarchy as being completely compatible with
progressivism I don't expect progressives to agree. I say this
because there are few people who are only progressives. Most
also ascribe to liberalism, socialism, social democracy, or
republicanism. And these ideologies often have their own
criticisms of monarchy. But perhaps I can hope that they will
admit that their opposition to monarchy stems from
secondary beliefs rather than any intrinsic conflict between
monarchy and progressivism.

Loyally Yours,
A Kisaragi Colour 

Prime Minister Trudeau Has His First Audience With The Queen

11/26/2015

 
Yesterday the Prime Minister had his first audience with Her
Majesty. During the public photo-op prior to Justin Trudeau's
private audience with the Queen the two exchanged pleasantries and remarked on their previous meeting when
​Justin Trudeau was but a child. Afterwards the Queen and her
​Prime Minister had a private discussion.
Picture
These private discussions are immensely important to our
system of government. A Prime Minister lives in a world 
where allies can be just as dangerous as enemies. A world
where he is surrounded by either supportive or critical
partisans at all times. Former British Prime Minister James
Callaghan described the 
meetings as being akin to a trip to
the psychiatrist
. The Queen takes her role as confidant
seriously and has never divulged the private matters
discussed with her ministers. 

The Queen also serves as a non-partisan source of advice and
experience. The Queen has a wealth of knowledge about what
policies governments have tried, what obstacles they faced,
and possible solutions. Repeatedly, Prime Ministers have
marveled at the width and breadth of the Queen's knowledge
of her Canadian realm. They probably shouldn't be. Her
Majesty has always taken a keen interest in the triumphs and
tragedies of her subjects. She has toured every province to an
extent no federal politician is likely to do. She knows her
country well. The Prime Minister would be wise to request,
and heed, Her Majesty's advice.

​Loyally Yours,
A Kisaragi Colour

Much Ado About Paintings

11/15/2015

 
Last week there was a bit of a stir when the Queen's portrait
was removed from the lobby of the Foreign Affairs building.
The portrait had hung there since 2011 when it replaced two
paintings by Quebec artist Alfred Pellan.
Picture
Photo: Adrian Wyld of The Canadian Press
The Monarchist League of Canada was not pleased. Outside
observers may see the reaction as a bit much. To understand
the reaction from the League requires knowing a bit of the
​history between the League and the Liberal Party of Canada.
Picture
The League formed in 1970 in order
to counter what was seen as the
'creeping republicanism' of the
governing Liberal Party. The slow
removal of royal symbols, downplay
of royal history, and subtle disregard
for the Crown was a war of attrition.
Every negative action taken by the
government in regards to the Crown
had to be confronted or Canada's
monarchy would face slow decay.

However, over the last ten years the monarchy has been
returned to its rightful place at the center of Canadian culture
by the Conservative Party. During the period in between the
Liberals held a vote on adopting opposition to the monarchy
as a part of party policy. While the vote failed 67-33 the
vote left some monarchists concerned about what the Liberal
Party would do in power. The Trudeau Liberals have also
made some supportive statements in favour of the
monarchy. However, saying things outside of power and
doing things once in power are completely different.

With the return of the Liberal Party after the recent election
the League is certainly looking for signs whether the
monarchy is now valued by the Liberals or whether it will be a
return to the previous policy of republicanism by a thousand
cuts. While the League is strictly non-partisan there isn't
a lot of trust for the new Liberal government as of yet. An
action like this so shortly after the election was likely to be
​interpreted as an attack. The portrait flap will probably come
to be seen as the first uneasy interaction between two groups
which have not had to work together for a while. I'm not
prepared to read too much into this action. One mistake a
trend doth not make. As for what ought to have been done
​about the paintings...  
Picture
The paintings in question
A compromise should have been found. The Conservatives are
somewhat to blame for the current situation. They set up a
situation that artificially pitted monarchism vs. Quebec
nationalism. The sensible solution, in 2011 as in 2015, would
be to have both the Queen's portrait and the paintings on the
(very large) wall. The paintings represent the diversity of
Canada. The portrait represents Canada's status as a
monarchy, a unifying force, and the person in whose name
the Foreign Affairs office acts. The wall is literally, and
figuratively big enough for both. 

Loyally Yours,
​A Kisaragi Colour

The Canadian Oath of Office

11/9/2015

 
PicturePhoto Credit: Global News
Justin Trudeau was sworn in as Canada's 23rd Prime Minister
last Wednesday. The process of being sworn in as a Prime
Minister of Canada involves three separate oaths. The first
was the Oath of Allegiance:

I, __________, do swear (declare) that I will be faithful and bear true
allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada,
Her Heirs and Successors.
So help me God.
The Oath of Allegiance is a requirement for assuming many
high offices in Canada as well as forming part of the Oath of
Citizenship sworn by those who wish to join the Canadian
family. The Oath of Allegiance is often taken along with other
specific oaths (as it is here). The second oath Justin Trudeau
took on Wednesday was the Oath of the Members of the
Privy Council
:
I, __________, do solemnly and sincerely swear (declare) that I shall
be a true and faithful servant to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the
Second, as a member of Her Majesty's Privy Council for Canada. I will in
all things to be treated, debated and resolved in Privy Council, faithfully,
honestly and truly declare my mind and my opinion. I shall keep secret
all matters committed and revealed to me in this capacity, or that shall
be secretly treated of in Council. Generally, in all things I shall do as a
faithful and true servant ought to do for Her Majesty.
So help me God.
Notice that while both oaths require sworn loyalty to the
sovereign the context is different. The first is a promise to be a
loyal Canadian, to do no harm to her Majesty (or her heirs),
and to present yourself as a friend to Canada. The second oath
is a promise (while also upholding loyalty) to do one's duty for
Canada. To finish everything off Justin Trudeau also took the
Oath of Office:
I, _________, do solemnly and sincerely promise and swear (declare)
that I will truly and faithfully, and to the best of my skill and knowledge,
execute the powers and trusts reposed in me as ...........
So help me God.
This is the only oath that does not require swearing some sort
of loyalty to the sovereign. This makes a bit more sense when
you consider that the office of Prime Minister is still merely primus inter pares, first among equals. You can't become
Prime Minister (or cabinet minister) without first being a
member of the Privy Council. It is this large group of Her
Majesty's advisers that Justin Trudeau became 'first among'.

There has been a tendency to concentrate power into the Office of the Prime Minister over the years. This slow-motion presidentialization of the office is one thing that the new
Prime Minister has promised to fix. It remains to be seen as
to whether he will follow through and become once again
first among Her Majesty's servants or continue to think of
themselves as over mighty presidential wannabes.  

Loyally Yours,
​A Kisaragi Colour   

    About

    This website is intended to be a resource for those arguing in favour of Canada's monarchy, researching Canada's royal past, or wondering what the various vice-regal representatives of the Canadian Crown are up to currently. As well, articles about other monarchies may appear from time to time. 

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014

    Categories

    All
    Afghanistan
    Aga Khan I
    Aga Khan II
    Aga Khan III
    Aga Khan IV
    Alberta
    Albert County
    Alexandra Mendès
    Alistair MacGregor
    Allison Lawlor
    Alt History
    Amita Kuttner
    Andrew Saxton
    Andrew Scheer
    Annamie Paul
    Archduke Franz Ferdinand
    Aria David
    Aron Seal
    Artwork
    Australian Monarchy
    Austria
    Barbados
    Barry MacKenzie
    Bloc Quebecois
    Blog Update
    Books
    Brad Trost
    Brazil
    Brian Graff
    British Columbia
    British Monarchy
    Canada Day
    Canada Post
    Canadian Monarchist News
    Canadian Monarchy
    CANZUK International
    Caribbean Monarchist League
    Carolingian Empire
    Cathy Bursey-Sabourin
    CFP
    Chandra Arya
    Charity
    Charlie Angus
    Charter Of Rights And Freedoms
    Chief Edward Machimity
    Chief John Thunder
    Chief Robert Joseph
    Chris Alexander
    Christian Bjørnskov
    Christmas
    Christ The King
    Citizenship Oath
    Clamavi De Profundis
    Commonwealth
    Communists
    Confederation
    Conservative Party
    Coronation
    Coronation Oath
    Costs Of The Crown
    Cricket
    Crown Jewels (of Canada)
    Dalton Camp
    David Johnson
    David Merner
    Deepak Obhrai
    Democracy
    Democracy Watch
    Denmark
    Derek Sloan
    Dominic Cardy
    Donald Booth
    Donald Trump
    Doug Ford
    Dr. Leslyn Lewis
    Duchess Of Cambridge
    Duchess Of Hohenberg
    Duke Of Cambridge
    Dylan Mainprize
    Dylan Perceval Maxwell
    Education
    Elizabeth May
    Elsie Wayne
    Emma Dent Coad
    Emperor Charles V
    Emperor Francis II
    Emperor Kangxi
    Emperor Nero
    Emperor Pedro II
    Emperor Qianlong
    English Monarchy
    Erin O'Toole
    FCP
    Fiji
    Frank Baylis
    French Monarchy
    George Stanley
    Glorious Revolution
    Government House
    Governor General
    Gov Gen. Adrienne Clarkson
    Gov Gen. David Johnston
    Gov Gen. Julie Payette
    Gov Gen. Mary Simon
    Grand Chief Henri Membertou
    Green Party
    Grenadian Monarchy
    GTA Branch
    Hawaii
    Heraldry
    Hitler
    Hockey
    Holy Roman Empire
    Homewards
    Hudson's Bay Company
    Ibrahim Bruno El-Khoury
    Interview
    Invictus Games
    Iran
    Jack Layton
    Jacques Monet
    Jagmeet Singh
    Jamaica
    James Hawkes
    Jean Charest
    Jody Wilson-Raybould
    John A. Macdonald
    John Boyko
    Jordan
    J.R.R. Tolkien
    Judy Green
    Julienne Bay
    Justin Trudeau
    Kathleen Wayne
    Kellie Leitch
    Kevin Gillespie
    King Alfonso XI
    King Carl XVI
    King Charles I
    King Charles II
    King Charles III
    King Charles XI
    King Christian IV
    King Edward I
    King Edward VII
    King Edward VIII
    King George I
    King George V
    King George VI
    King Henry VIII
    King James VI & I
    King Juan Carlos I
    King Louis XIV
    King Louis XVI
    King Matthias Corvinus
    King's Counsel
    King William IV
    King Zahir Shah
    Kisaragi
    Labour Party
    Leona Alleslev
    Letters Patent
    Liberal Party
    Lisa LaFlamme
    Lisa Raitt
    Lord Ludichris
    Loyalists
    Lt. Gov. Brenda Murphy
    Lt. Gov. Elizabeth Dowdeswell
    Lt. Gov. Graydon Nicholas
    Lt. Gov. Jocelyne Roy Vienneau
    Lt. Gov. John Graves Simcoe
    Lt. Richard Wilson
    Mackenzie King
    Magnum Concilium
    Marilyn Gladu
    Mark Steyn
    Mary Lincoln
    Maxime Bernier
    Meme
    Meryam Haddad
    Michael Chong
    Michael Valpy
    Mike Holland
    Mi'kmaw
    Mirrors For Princes
    Mohawks
    Monarchist League Of Canada
    Monarchist League Of Grenada
    Morocco
    Mr. Windsor
    Native Kingship
    Nawanagar
    NDP
    Neil MacAlasdair
    Netherlands
    New Brunswick
    Newfoundland
    News
    New Year's Levee
    New York
    New Zealand
    Normandy
    Nova Scotia
    Oath Of Allegiance
    Olympics
    Omoba Aina
    Ontario
    PACT
    Papua New Guinean Monarchy
    Parliament
    Pat Stogran
    PEI
    People's Alliance
    People's Party
    Peter Julian
    Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard
    Peter MacKay
    Peter Russell
    Peter Stoffer
    Philippe Lagasse
    Pierre Elliott Trudeau
    Pierre Lemieux
    Playlist
    Pope Boniface VIII
    Prime Minister
    Prince Albert
    Prince Andrew
    Prince Arthur
    Prince Charles
    Prince Edward
    Prince Ermias Sahle Selassie
    Prince Felipe
    Prince George
    Prince Harry
    Prince Philip
    Prince Reza Pahlavi
    Prince Rupert
    Princess Anne
    Princess Louise
    Prince Victor
    Prince William
    Profiles
    Progressive Bloggers
    Progressivism
    Quebec
    Queen Anne
    Queen Elizabeth I
    Queen Elizabeth II
    Queen's Counsel
    Queen Victoria
    Quotes
    Randall Garrison
    R.B. Bennett
    Referendum
    Religion
    Remembrance Day
    Republicans
    Restoration
    Richard Bassett
    Rick Peterson
    Right To Be Consulted
    Right To Encourage
    Right To Warn
    Robert Finch
    Robert Pichette
    Robertson Davies
    Rob Moore
    Romana Didulo
    Rome
    Royal 22nd Regiment
    Royal Anthems
    Royal Christmas Message
    Royal Jubilee
    Royal St. John's Regatta
    Royal Tour
    Royal Warrant
    Saskatchewan
    Saudi Arabia
    Science
    Scott Aitchison
    Scott Morrison
    Sir David Kirke
    Sir Samuel Leonard Tilley
    Six Nations
    Social Media
    Stephen Harper
    St. John's
    Succession
    Sultan Alauddin Riayat Shah
    Supreme Court Of Canada
    The Ceremonial Guard
    The Constitution
    The Enlightenment
    The Mad Monarchist
    The Phoenix Project
    Tim Besley
    Timeline
    Tim Thompson
    Tom Freda
    Tom Mulcair
    Tony Abbott
    Tony Clement
    Top 10 List
    United States
    Victoria Day
    Viscount Monck
    Wallis Simpson
    Walter Bagehot
    Wet'suwet'en
    Winston Churchill
    W. L. Morton
    Young Monarchists
    Yukon
    Yves-François Blanchet
    Zahedi Center

    RSS Feed

    Picture
    Proud Supporter of the Monarchist League of Canada
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Proud Supporter of Connecting Albert County
    Picture
    Elsie Wayne 1932-2016
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.